CVE-2026-90138

INFO Priority: 0.00 BB Relevance: 0/100
Published: 2026-09-17 Modified: 2026-10-30 First seen: 2026-10-30 Status: pending_score

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: don't check the listener's sk_err in vsock_accept() Syzbot reported an issue which can be reproduced with these steps: r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT}) connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -> -1, EPROTO (self-connect) listen(r0, backlog) -> 0 r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -> 0 accept(r0) -> -1, EPROTO (stale sk_err) Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back to r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it to be incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The unexpected packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO. After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This listen() call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never inspects or clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a normal client and connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this incoming connection because the listener's sk_err still holds the EPROTO error from the earlier failed self-connect. This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket. For a non-blocking connect(), vsock_connect() may return -EINPROGRESS immediately, and vsock_connect_timeout() can later set sk->sk_err asynchronously. Since no vsock transport ever sets sk_err on a socket while it is in TCP_LISTEN state, checking it in vsock_accept() serves no purpose and only carries forward errors left behind by earlier, unrelated connection attempts on the same socket. Remove the checks so accept() no longer rejects valid incoming connections because of a stale error, which also avoids the resource leak described above.

Affected Software (7)

VendorProductVersion
Linux Linux d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238 < c99d12052f663d9914bc944302fee5a1d50d8ca5
Linux Linux d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238 < 64348c55dd7596ca2c033dcd102af44bdd7e8acd
Linux Linux d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238 < c5a75d37c21e558cc6fad1597e732ead30745eed
Linux Linux d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238 < 36e5fa009f98a4edbe1783ac11c0df672b224742
Linux Linux d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238 < 491b368a0c6e5f28b615a50b0d384f5c25fde2a7
Linux Linux d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238 < b8c899cf5e7be29840a172c183dedd8d3e7a0287
Linux Linux 3.9

Bug Bounty Relevance

0 / 100

CVSS Score

Unscored

EPSS — Exploitation Probability

0.21%
Raw Score 0.002120
Percentile 11.5%
Date 2026-10-31

EPSS Trend

2026-10-31
0.00212
2026-10-30
0.00206
2026-10-29
0.00206

Intelligence Sources

mitre ref →
nvd ref →