Browse All CVEs
50,424 vulnerabilities.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | EPSS | First Seen | Flags | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2026-125070 |
medium | 6.8 | 0.0018 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in tqi_decode_frame | |
CVE-2026-125069 |
medium | 5.7 | 0.0017 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the Motion Pixel | |
CVE-2026-125068 |
medium | 6.8 | 0.0018 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the Bink video d | |
CVE-2026-125067 |
medium | 6.8 | 0.0018 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in vble_decode_fram | |
CVE-2026-125066 |
medium | 6.8 | 0.0018 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the Cirrus Logic | |
CVE-2026-125065 |
medium | 6.8 | 0.0018 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in tgv_decode_inter | |
CVE-2026-125064 |
medium | 6.8 | 0.0018 | 2026-11-09 | FFmpeg through 9.0.2 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in g726_decode_fram | |
CVE-2026-112321 |
high | 7.5 | 0.0120 | 2026-11-09 | The AUTH_GSSAPI handler in lib/rpc/svc_auth_gssapi.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) does not | |
CVE-2026-112320 |
high | 7.5 | 0.0097 | 2026-11-09 | The GSS-RPC transport layer in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.4 and later does not release th | |
CVE-2026-112319 |
medium | 6.5 | 0.0099 | 2026-11-09 | The GSS-RPC layer in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) does not enforce size limits on XDR-decoded | |
CVE-2026-112318 |
medium | 6.5 | 0.0075 | 2026-11-09 | The policy RPC stubs in kadmin/server/server_stubs.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.5.3 an | |
CVE-2026-112317 |
medium | 5.3 | 0.0077 | 2026-11-09 | krb5_ktkdb_get_entry() in lib/kdb/keytab.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.2.8 and later do | |
CVE-2026-112316 |
medium | 6.5 | 0.0092 | 2026-11-09 | xdr_krb5_tl_data() in lib/kadm5/kadm_rpc_xdr.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) does not free | |
CVE-2026-112315 |
medium | 5.3 | 0.0088 | 2026-11-09 | The RPCSEC_GSS authentication routines in lib/rpc/authgss_prot.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka kr | |
CVE-2026-112314 |
high | 7.5 | 0.0123 | 2026-11-09 | clnttcp_call() in lib/rpc/clnt_tcp.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) does not free the RPC re | |
CVE-2026-83020 |
critical | 10.0 | 0.0051 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware | |
CVE-2026-83011 |
high | 8.1 | 0.0039 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware | |
CVE-2026-82996 |
high | 7.8 | 0.0016 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware | |
CVE-2026-82995 |
critical | 9.8 | 0.0051 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware | |
CVE-2026-82994 |
critical | 9.8 | 0.0051 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware | |
CVE-2026-73961 |
critical | 9.8 | 0.0051 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle JDeveloper product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: ADF | |
CVE-2026-70755 |
medium | 6.5 | 0.0035 | 2026-11-09 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator product of Oracle E-Busine | |
CVE-2026-11918 |
medium | 6.5 | 0.0017 | 2026-11-09 | IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway <= v1.0.4 IBM mcp-context-forge could allow an authenticated | |
CVE-2025-34606 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulne | |
CVE-2025-34604 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulne | |
CVE-2025-15427 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: | |
CVE-2025-22202 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record b | |
CVE-2025-22197 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record b | |
CVE-2025-13074 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was | |
CVE-2025-34412 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority | |
CVE-2025-34411 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority | |
CVE-2025-67907 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-67906. Reason: Thi | |
CVE-2025-12532 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was | |
CVE-2025-14281 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-13977 | |
CVE-2025-67514 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: Vulnerability is dependency-based. | |
CVE-2025-14024 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was | |
CVE-2025-66478 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | 25 PoC | Rejected reason: This CVE is a duplicate of CVE-2025-55182. |
CVE-2025-65794 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was wit | |
CVE-2025-3747 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID was duplicated of CVE-2025-32801 | |
CVE-2025-58440 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | 1 PoC | Rejected reason: The unisharp/laravel-filemanager is a separate project, unrelated to lara |
CVE-2025-58171 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: This CVE is a duplicate of another CVE. | |
CVE-2024-11086 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was | |
CVE-2024-6413 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2414. | |
CVE-2024-10691 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-9530. | |
CVE-2024-10686 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-51689 | |
CVE-2024-10694 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-9542. | |
CVE-2024-50315 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: | |
CVE-2024-48342 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidat | |
CVE-2024-9899 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-2143. | |
CVE-2024-46914 |
— | — | — | 2026-11-09 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in er |